Rebuttal on Mah's comment on HDB
-
Dear Minister Mah,
I refer to the 15 Apr 2011 Straits Times report of your comments on the Workers’ Party’s housing proposals.
You said government subsidies on new HDB flats add up to $1 billion each year. What government subsidy are you referring to? If you are referring to the $40,000 HDB grant, HDB resale prices have gone up by more than $150,000 over the last four years. Since new flats are pegged to resale flats, new flats must be fetching an additional $100,000 each at least. Therefore, new flats should fetch more billions for the government than the $1 billion ’subsidy’ each year.
If you’re referring instead to land cost subsidies, then whatever that the HDB pays for land equates to earnings by the Singapore Land authority (SLA). This is merely an internal transfer and not real subsidy. Given that land was already bought for as cheap as $1 over the past decades, land costs are hardly a cost to the government.
Pegging housing prices to salaries does not necessarily mean asset devaluation. Isn’t your insistence on 30% income limit for housing purchase a form of pegging housing price to salaries, albeit too high a peg?
The PAP’s asset enhancement policy is also a liability enhancement policy. As housing prices soar, so do Singaporeans’ housing mortgages, albeit those of the later generations.
If you disagree with Ms Sylvia Lim’s statement that resale prices take some time to filter to new flats, why didn’t you show more concern when resale prices started to shoot up four years ago? If you believe resale flats and new flats are interlinked and rising resale flat price will lead to rising new flat price, why didn’t you do more to curb rising prices then?
You said the cost of a new flat is $300,000. But a huge chunk of the $300,000 bill is land cost which gets reflected as profit for the SLA instead. So take that out and show us the real cost instead.
There is nothing wrong in making assets grow except that it also makes future liabities grow as well. Of course you are proud of the asset enhancement policy because it means every new flat the government sells fetches more money for the government.
You said you are proud to have given almost all Singaporeans a home. If you didn’t take away almost all our land on the cheap in the first place, why would we have needed you to give us a home?
Thank you
Ng Kok Lim
- 19 Apr 2011, Temasek Review
-
This is PAP's policy of enslavement, tie you up with mountains of debt from your HDB housing, keep you working till you are in your 70s.
The excess money they earn goes into their pockets so that they can get multi-million dollar salaries.
But majority of Singaporeans still stupid, so I expect them to be in power for 1-3 more elections.
-
it's all trials and tribulations.
-
he is only interested in making more money to top up the reserves so that they can give themselves out of this world salary.
-
MBT has to be kicked out .
Wherever he goes, tat zheng hu dept sure make $$ for PAP
tat's why aft being defeated by CST in 1984, he went to Tampines and become ministar.
CST's record shows tat his biggest election win was against ironically MBT
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
MBT has to be kicked out .
Wherever he goes, tat zheng hu dept sure make $$ for PAP
tat's why aft being defeated by CST in 1984, he went to Tampines and become ministar.
CST's record shows tat his biggest election win was against ironically MBT
mbt is expensive.
-
MBT is so full of bullshit
-
-
Yes, HDB flats are highly "subsidized".
And yes, they are highly affordable.
-
$1200 per month is affordable
for 21.88 years excl interest
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
$1200 per month is affordable
for 21.88 years excl interest
And guess how many Singaporeans earn that gross monthly figure in Singapore?