I know it is over but there's this irritating question that is quite wierd to answer.
It is Qn 5 where they ask how to convert a compound similar to phenol into 3-amine,4-nitrophenol in 2 steps?
It is not possible right unless...??
My guess was to
1) do an electrophilic substitution such that you get 2 nitro groups substituted
2) followed by, Sn/conc. HCl/ reflux under some kind of controlled conditions so that one nitro group can reduced but not the other?
My main doubt is how is that possible? one nitro group becomes amine but not the other?
I didn't see the actual question, and you (or someone else who sat for the exam) will have to give me the exact compounds ("a compound similar to phenol"?) and exact question for me to give the solution.
Offhand, I'll point out the following :
1) OH (substituent on a benzene ring) has a lone pair available for delocalization and is hence electron donating by resonance and is therefore ortho and para directing.
2) NO2 (substituent on a benzene ring) has a +ve formal charge and is hence electron withdrawing by induction, and is therefore meta directing.
3) NH2 (substituent on a benzene ring), on its own (assuming it has already been reduced by tin with conc HCl from NO2 to NH2), has a lone pair available for delocalization and is hence electron donating by resonance and is therefore ortho and para directing.
4) Consider steric effects too (para position is favoured over ortho positions due to steric hinderance).
As for your line of thought regarding protecting one group while reacting another similar or identical group; this is an organic chemistry synthesis strategy of converting/replacing one group (to be protected) to a temporary inert/non-reactive (protected) group, while you carry out the reaction for the non-protected similar group to become the desired group, afterwhich you re-convert the inert/non-reactive (protected) group back into its original group.
Although such synthesis strategies are not usually taught in any significant depth by the JCs at H2 level and it may not be relevant to this particular question.
Perhaps lets wait for the exact question (and its exact compounds... what exactly is the "compound similar to phenol"?) to be posted by someone, or published in next year's TYS?
Sorry forgot to attach the question.
Originally posted by contemporarydancer:Sorry forgot to attach the question.
hi.
1st step :the electrophilic addtion of 2 mols of NO2+ electrophile for 1 mol of R like what u have suggested.
2nd step : For both NO2 to get reduce, u need 2 mols of H2 . so to get T, u need only 1 mol of H2 for 1 mol of S. i think need to state the mol ratio. Thats what i think.
sorry i cant find my paper now. but anyone knows how to do question 2 last last part? the one on isomerism.
2(g) In another separate experiment, a new alkane F, C6H14, was produced. When reacted with bromine under ultraviolet light, F produced only two isomeric monobromo compounds G and H, with the formula C6H13Br. Compound H was chiral. Suggest the structures of F, G and H, explaining your reasoning. [3]
Ok, now with the question, here we go.
R is an ether (R-O-R).
The OCH2CH2CH3 substituent is electron donating by both resonance and induction, hence is ortho and para directing.
arigatoast suggested :
>>> 2nd step : For both NO2 to get reduce, u need 2 mols of H2 . so to get T, u need only 1 mol of H2 for 1 mol of S. i think need to state the mol ratio. Thats what i think. <<<
That's smart thinking; although in practice, instead of uniformly obtaining only one product of 5-nitro-2-propoxyaniline, you would end up with a mixture of several different products (eg. in some molecules, both nitro groups would be reduced; in some other molecules, neither of the nitro groups would be reduced; in yet other molecules, the para instead of ortho nitro group would be reduced) in other words, a horribly low yield).
Which is why, while in theory it seems very easy : just add aqueous HNO3, then reduce one of the nitro groups to amine group (by using Sn and conc HCl).
But in practice, here are two serious problems :
1) When using the aqueous HNO3, how can the chemist ensure only di-nitration occurs, instead of mono or tri nitration? (the propoxy group directs the incoming nitro electrophile to the ortho and para positions).
2) When carrying out reduction, how can the chemist ensure only one of the two nitro groups (and furthemore, to be precise, the nitro group ortho to the ethoxy group) gets reduced to amine?
I would think the yield would be too low for such a synthesis pathway to be viable.
However, since this compound is a commercially synthesized artificial sweetener (albeit a toxic one), there should be a better synthesis strategy (which will require a lot more than 2 steps) for this compound, and hence, it is possible that this 2008 H2 SEAB-Cambridge exam question is not a fair one (ie. it probably isn't a fair question if the only 2-step synthesis possible, gives too low a yield to be viable).
nitro benzene doesn't get reduced by h2. u nid con hcl and Sn. i tink it shud b due to stearic hindrance that only one nitro grp gets reduced.
2(g)
CH3 H
| |
F : H3C-C - C - CH3
| |
CH3 H
den i tin from there u shud know wad G and H is (:
nitro benzene doesn't get reduced by h2. u nid con hcl and Sn. i tink it shud b due to stearic hindrance that only one nitro grp gets reduced.**
im not sure bout this :p
but i really regretted doing qns 2.. made me so depress after that .. no mood to study for the maths paper 2 haha..
>>> 2(g) In another separate experiment, a new alkane F, C6H14, was produced. When reacted with bromine under ultraviolet light, F produced only two isomeric monobromo compounds G and H, with the formula C6H13Br. Compound H was chiral. Suggest the structures of F, G and H, explaining your reasoning. <<<
The only C6H14 alkane that when monobrominated would yield only 2 isomers one of which is a chiral compound, is 2,3-dimethylbutane.
Notice that 2,3-dimethylbutane has a mirror plane of symmetry. Substituting away H on the 4 terminal C atoms (1st, 4th, 2 methyl and 3 methyl carbons) are equivalent. That leaves the 2nd and 3rd C atoms, which are also equivalent thanks to this mirror plane.
To obtain the chiral compound, substitute away H on (any of the 4) terminal carbons. The 2nd (or 3rd) C atom would then be the chiral carbon.
Drink more chocolate.
Originally posted by Chocoholicxx:nitro benzene doesn't get reduced by h2. u nid con hcl and Sn. i tink it shud b due to stearic hindrance that only one nitro grp gets reduced.**
im not sure bout this :p
but i really regretted doing qns 2.. made me so depress after that .. no mood to study for the maths paper 2 haha..
Don't be depressed. Cheer yourself up with some chocolate, Chocoholicxx!
(It's true, chocolate contains biochemical compounds that can cheer you up when you're depressed.)
>>> nitro benzene doesn't get reduced by h2. u nid con hcl and Sn. i tink it shud b due to stearic hindrance that only one nitro grp gets reduced <<<
Point#1 - At the correct temperature and pressure, and with the correct catalyst, you can indeed reduce nitrobenzene to phenylamine using hydrogen gas. And in fact, it is the indeed hydrogen gas that is produced from reaction between conc HCl and Sn (or Fe or Zn), that carries out the reduction.
Point#2 - The problem with your (nice enough) hypothesis, that if you use steric hinderance to explain why only 1 nitro group gets reduced, then it should be the ortho nitro group (relative to the ethoxy group) that is hindered and not reduced, and you would expect the para nitro group to be reduced instead. But as you can see from the structure of 5-nitro-2-propoxyaniline, it is the opposite of what your hypothesis would predict. So no go here.
Go drink some chocolate. Work hard, play hard, drink more chocolate.
cannnot b 2-3 di methyl butane wad.. if sub H on the 2nd C will have 2 methy grp. so no chiral. sub H on the first C will have 2 H grp. Is my 2,2 dimethyl wrong? =x
Drink more chocolate.
Drink more chocolate.
Drink more chocolate.
oh yes :D ok 2-3 is correct.. just checked it out.. but 2-2 dimethyl rite, there is only H- grp on the first and 2nd C so how is it possible to get 3 mono isomers?
Originally posted by Chocoholicxx:oh yes :D ok 2-3 is correct.. just checked it out.. but 2-2 dimethyl rite, there is only H- grp on the first and 2nd C so how is it possible to get 3 mono isomers?
oh ya =x tot 4th same as 1st.. but on sec look they arn't symmetrical haha opps =x mayb too stressed =[ hiax
thanks ! :D
Originally posted by Chocoholicxx:nitro benzene doesn't get reduced by h2. u nid con hcl and Sn. i tink it shud b due to stearic hindrance that only one nitro grp gets reduced.
ya i know.. i am explaining on the basis that everybody here knows that so i wont have to repeat wad u all have know.. the main point i want to say is the mol ratio..
so does anybody have a better answer than mine to the question by contemporarydancer?
i dun think it is 2,3 dimethylbutane.
no matter how you sub ur 1 hydrogen for bromine, you would get either 2 hydrogen on 1 C atom, or 2 methyl on 1 C atom. there will be no chirality then.
Originally posted by deathmaster:i dun think it is 2,3 dimethylbutane.
no matter how you sub ur 1 hydrogen for bromine, you would get either 2 hydrogen on 1 C atom, or 2 methyl on 1 C atom. there will be no chirality then.
Wanna bet on it?
Hint : You're looking at the wrong carbon when checking for chirality, when you substitute away a H for a Br.
PS. Drink more chocolate, it may help you to see the chiral carbon.
contemporarydancer, arigatoast, Chocoholicxx, secretliker, rs rs, update on this question.
I've discussed this question on another forum, and a professional Chemist confirmed my suspicions - the only way to reduce only one of two nitro groups present (with a high yield), is to use a reagent not taught within the H2 (or even H3) syllabus.
This reagent is sodium sulfide.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduction_of_nitro_compounds
It's unlikely that the SEAB-Cambridge guys expected you guys to know this reagent, it's more likely that they didn't care about the yield, they just wanted to you to suggest a possible synthesis pathway, no matter how low the yield.
Since this commercial compound exists, there had to be a better (ie. higher yield) pathway for its synthesis. It turns out to be the one involving sodium sulfide. Evidently, SEAB-Cambridge in setting the 2008 H2 Chem paper, thought it would make for an interesting question to use this compound (they didn't care that students would be confused and frustrated by the mysterious selective reduction) and went ahead to ask for an unrealisitc 2-step synthesis pathway, in spite of the fact that sodium sulfide reduction is not taught within it's syllabus, and without such the selective reduction of only the ortho nitro group would result in a pitiably low yield.
Ah well. That's SEAB-Cambridge for you.
Another helpful Chemist shared :
>>> Apparently it is called the Zinin Reduction, and is pretty old chemistry (with the initial info published in those old German journals, ~1842). I found an old text relating to it. At the end of the 3rd page, they mention the selective reduction of di or tri-nitro compounds. <<<
I replied :
>>> Thanks for taking the time and effort to search on this. Much appreciated.
The Zinin Reduction is obscure, for sure. I couldn't find it in any of my (half-a-dozen) Organic Chem texts, and finally found a mention in pg 1817 of "March's Advanced Organic Chemistry, 6th Edition".
Online search reveals similar obscurity :
http://www.answers.com/Zinin%20Reduction
Well, point proven. SEAB-Cambridge must think it most amusing to annoy 'A' level (H2 level) students with this question (which is impossible to answer within the context of their limited syllabus). <<<
hi Ultimaonline.
thanks for the update and yr effort!
Gd luck to all the A level kids here. still have P1 and P2