2006 - 5b
both hydrogen and helium have been used to fill balloons. Hydrogn is more reactive and less safe to use.
use the electronic structure of the atoms of these two elements to explain why hydrogen is more reactive than helium. (3marks)
2006 - 5c
Aluminium is an element in group 3 of the periodic table. Use your knowledge of electronic structure to explain why aluminium is a metal. (3marks)
anyone can help me?
Helium is a noble gas, noble gas have no charge and are stable and unreactive
Hydrogen has a plus one charge, it needs one more electron to achieve the noble gas structure, thus it is more reactive than helium as there are transfer of electrons happening.
Originally posted by gunner77:2006 - 5b
both hydrogen and helium have been used to fill balloons. Hydrogn is more reactive and less safe to use.
use the electronic structure of the atoms of these two elements to explain why hydrogen is more reactive than helium. (3marks)
2006 - 5c
Aluminium is an element in group 3 of the periodic table. Use your knowledge of electronic structure to explain why aluminium is a metal. (3marks)
anyone can help me?
It has three valence electrons, causing it to give out rather than take in electron to form an ion.
aluminium has 3 outer electrons thus it will give away 3 electrons to form a ionic bond with a non-metal. And metals are always the one that gives away electrons..
lol,2 more days to practical! ):
Originally posted by crimsontactics:It has three valence electrons, causing it to give out rather than take in electron to form an ion.
but like tat answer will give u full 3 marks?
Hi Gunner,
tin tin is online, perhaps you can ask him now.
Regards,
ahm97sic
anybody can help me answer can liao
gunner dowan me liao... and tin tin is a she thanks
Originally posted by tinuviel07:gunner dowan me liao... and tin tin is a she thanks
HUH !!
U ARE A GAL ! wah seh i thought u boy
no la i want u
pls help me :(
lol.. =.="
both hydrogen and helium have been used to fill balloons. Hydrogn is more reactive and less safe to use.
use the electronic structure of the atoms of these two elements to explain why hydrogen is more reactive than helium. (3marks)
When elements have stable electronic configurations, they are very unreactive as they have a fully-filled outer shell. Hydrogen has electronic configuration 1 and hence it will undergo bonding with another element to form a compound to achieve stable electronic configuration.
Helium on the other hand, has 2 electrons in the outershell, hence its outershell is completely filled, making it very stable and unreactive.
then the part B leh
Originally posted by tinuviel07:lol.. =.="
both hydrogen and helium have been used to fill balloons. Hydrogn is more reactive and less safe to use.
use the electronic structure of the atoms of these two elements to explain why hydrogen is more reactive than helium. (3marks)
When elements have stable electronic configurations, they are very unreactive as they have a fully-filled outer shell. Hydrogen has electronic configuration 1 and hence it will undergo bonding with another element to form a compound to achieve stable electronic configuration.
Helium on the other hand, has 2 electrons in the outershell, hence its outershell is completely filled, making it very stable and unreactive.
Helium on the other hand, has 2 electrons in the outershell, hence its outershell is completely filled, making it very stable and unreactive.
I think it would much easiler to just remember helium as a noble gas. Noble gases are unreactive and stable.
yes it's true that noble gases are unreactive but the question asked why.. or did i read it wrongly?
Originally posted by gunner77:
but like tat answer will give u full 3 marks?
Hmm, i think its this way,
1. Al has 3 valence electrons
2. Causing it to give electrons rather than take
3. To form a positive ion ( by maith )
Originally posted by tinuviel07:yes it's true that noble gases are unreactive but the question asked why.. or did i read it wrongly?
Your answer is correct. It's just that i fill that by writing the noble gases thing will be more time-saving as it requires lesser words.
ohh thanks everyone !
tin tin help me with maths
i post the question liao thanks very very much!
solid D is a speckled green and white.
the green particles dissolve in water but the white particles do not.
is solid D a compound, element or mixture?
the answer is mixture but i dont understand why?
there is only 2 particles, shouldn't it be compound?
i put it crudely ok? haha..
if the whole thing is compound, the whole thing should dissolve in water or the whole thing should not dissolve in water ma.. means there's two separate parts behaving differently in water.. means mixture lor.. cause two separate things together..
if like say you put NaCl in water.. the whole thing dissolve right? won't be one part dissolve one part don't..
but if you have say NaCl and BaSO4 (insoluble in water), then the NaCl will dissolve but the BaSO4 won't and this is a mixture cause they behave differently
ohh !
icic. hmm now i understand.
thanks! one more question.
an ore contains 10% by mass of the minera, wolframite
wolframite contains tungsten,W and has the formula (FeMn)WO4
(i) calculate the mass of wolframite in 10 tonnes if the ore.
(II) calculate the mass of tungstenin 10 tonnes of the ore.
[ relative atomic masses: A; O, 16; Mn, 55; Fe 56; W, 184 ]
Originally posted by gunner77:ohh !
icic. hmm now i understand.
thanks! one more question.
an ore contains 10% by mass of the minera, wolframite
wolframite contains tungsten,W and has the formula (FeMn)WO4
(i) calculate the mass of wolframite in 10 tonnes if the ore.
(II) calculate the mass of tungstenin 10 tonnes of the ore.
[ relative atomic masses: A; O, 16; Mn, 55; Fe 56; W, 184 ]
who the hell give such a name.. grr
Mass of wolf = 10% x 10tonnes = XXX
Mass of tungsten = (Ar of Tungsten / Mr of wolf) x ( XXX )
remember to change tonnes to grams
ohh !!
ok thanks alot! more no liao
thank cute
okie.. np
u may go to bed now
sleep well.
i need to repair the image of u in my mind.
i need to change the gender.
err okay.. don't repair too jialat-ly
Originally posted by tinuviel07:who the hell give such a name.. grr
Mass of wolf = 10% x 10tonnes = XXX
Mass of tungsten = (Ar of Tungsten / Mr of wolf) x ( XXX )
remember to change tonnes to grams
wait wait
tin tin i wan to ask u
the mass of tungsten shouldn't it be ( ar of tungsten/mr of wolf) x 100% ?