Originally posted by Maith:lmao catch no balls. Can give like example? :D
how to give example now?
Originally posted by gunner77:
how to give example now?
like each paragraph write what la
Originally posted by Maith:and purpose is?
Purpose format is like that:|
Let's say the picture shows the USA tax payers complaining about the huge amount spend on the iraq war. (for example only)
The u should follow this format write.
The purpose of the source is to show how the war in iraq has caused massive debt to the USA so that the USA Govt will hopefully reduce the war on iraq budget.
Remember, got cause always got effect. SO you say purpose already cannot just end there, must say "so that" somebody will do something to overcome the 'purpose problem'.
Originally posted by Ferrari_RoXz:
Purpose format is like that:|
Let's say the picture shows the USA tax payers complaining about the huge amount spend on the iraq war. (for example only)
The u should follow this format write.
The purpose of the source is to show how the war in iraq has caused massive debt to the USA so that the USA Govt will hopefully reduce the war on iraq budget.
Remember, got cause always got effect. SO you say purpose already cannot just end there, must say "so that" somebody will do something to overcome the 'purpose problem'.
so the purpose is always at the end?
Originally posted by Maith:like each paragraph write what la
1st para---> wat can u tell. then u continue with evidence
2nd para---> 2nd thing that u can tell, continue with evidence.
last para--> if u can find the purpose then u put the purpose, if cannot just end off with conculsion
Originally posted by Maith:so the purpose is always at the end?
Usually. You can write purpose only if you want. If you correct, full marks. Wrong, 0 marks. But I would personally not do that because purpose is quite difficult to get correct and if you wrong. Bye bye 0 marks. If you write both, at least your inference should save you from getting 0
Originally posted by gunner77:
1st para---> wat can u tell. then u continue with evidence2nd para---> 2nd thing that u can tell, continue with evidence.
last para--> if u can find the purpose then u put the purpose, if cannot just end off with conculsion
i see...ok thanks! Im going to school now,hope can find my teacher :D good luck for ur paper later! bye
Originally posted by Ferrari_RoXz:
Usually. You can write purpose only if you want. If you correct, full marks. Wrong, 0 marks. But I would personally not do that because purpose is quite difficult to get correct and if you wrong. Bye bye 0 marks. If you write both, at least your inference should save you from getting 0
ah..risky...lol nvm. Good luck for ur paper later too!
good luck guys im off too now
do ur best
I'm off three! Gd luck
ok im here to make some notes for globalisation
key driving forces of glabalisation
1) developments in transport and communication - easy to buill crap
2)TNCs- new markets, lower cost of labour
3) none
Impact
economic impact
1) higher SOL - more variety of choice(free trade), investments come in, more revenue due to investments.
2)Increased competition
that to attract foreign investments - incentives
that of market - the rival port of singapore rmb? port in jorhor. Cheapter rates and more flexible
3) widening income gap. Core periphery theory just bull crap.
Social impact
1) awareness of foreign culture
2) loss of it
Environmental
1) deforestation
2) global warming
3)sth good, envoronmental mgmt - sustainable dev., alternative sources of energy.
Singapore strats
1) diversify economy
2) Nurturing growth of Small and med enterprise.
3) venturing abroad
4) economic cooperation
5) managing resources effectively - people FT, entreprenour -environment - land, green week, plastic bag no use day.
no time. bye XD
D&D
HOUSING
GOOD GOVERNANCE
came out.
limpper u do which one?
i do DD
i do gg, good governance.
& the paper, i sure gg -.-
wah heng i study DD
the SBQ u can do?
the dint manage to finish my part D conculsion
part C also never finish.
How is the paper?
In my opinion, SEQ is easy but SBQ is ...............(nothing to say)...
u do which one for seq?
y ntg too say?... if i were to compare its vocab with pasts paper, this is one of the easiest to understand, because my vocab is relatively low..
i did dd too.... part b i say about Mil. Coo, sdi and citizen armed forces
And horr... all my sbq average length is...
Start....
..............................................................................END
Didn't manage to make similar comparison in part b, just wrote a neutral sentence w/o prove.
Due to time!
my part B i use citizenship armed force, military cooperation, total defense
important factor --> total defence
i love the source based becoz its very interesting.
i learn something as well.
I do governance..
The SBQ is quite understandable.. I am not saying that the source is difficult.. Is the question..
Originally posted by gunner77:my part B i use citizenship armed force, military cooperation, total defense
important factor --> total defence
i love the source based becoz its very interesting.
i learn something as well.
Every factor will sounds very important as long you know how to link it to the main factor, MC.
to summerize mine, 'SDI need CAF to tests its equipment on MC'
every SBQ is interesting if u had never knew about it. However if u knew about it, rate of undestanding is faster.
i do gg and i sure gg also.
Originally posted by gLc:i do gg and i sure gg also.
any funny story anot?
the china gal how
Originally posted by MyNameisNas:Every factor will sounds very important as long you know how to link it to the main factor, MC.
to summerize mine, 'SDI need CAF to tests its equipment on MC'
every SBQ is interesting if u had never knew about it. However if u knew about it, rate of undestanding is faster.
ya its about how u link it