You tell me.
-
Originally posted by ditzy:Example 001:
2 characters, guy A, and guy B.
guy A claims that guy B is in the wrong and should admit his mistake, guy B ignores guy A's pleas' and carries on with his mistake.
After looking at so many flaming threads, you should be aware that there are people who will not listen/change/budge even if they know that they are wrong.
Don't waste time on them. -
wow, u mention "it"... referring to an animal...Originally posted by xiao_shin:well never mind as long as it serves it as a warning.... whether the pple read it or not... hope that it will remember that...
Wonder if referring to Croco...wahhahahhaa
-
ha, unlawful assembly ? wun lah...unless one fella brings a parang or something. common motive is to settle a misunderstanding or dispute not SMLJ settlement talk. there is no law to govern you cannot assemble in large numbers for legitimate purposes. you are free to sit and position yourself where you want in public places.Originally posted by xiao_shin:hmm.... well it does really have to depends on suitation u see.... for u no.1 pple can slug all they wan but if the "culpurit
chooses to hide inside his cave and act blurr that he didnt know this thread existance" then it will be pointless..
For no.2... maybe it will work out only lor... just imagine that two partiesgoing to the outings... if one parties are not satisfied.... what will be the endings??? all ended out police station??? charge under the law of unlawful assembly with common intention?? (law changes depends on the number of pple there) hahaha....
ah dee...you just become mada huh ? don't really take wat u learn in tracom out to the 'outside' world, don't work one lah....haha. -
Originally posted by sgboy2004:it is definitely one of the solution, but may not be the best one for the culcript who thinks he is always the king and always right.
it is better to clear up with tat person's ego than to let the little cocoon living in the belief that the worm will always be the best. Yeah. In the end, he will only be right in his own world. -
Originally posted by ditzy:And if the flame starter is so obviously in the right and the victim being flamed is so obviously in the wrong? To me it looks like the same thing.
If the victim don't learn, don't waste time. -
Great influencial power how
-
Originally posted by ditzy:To add, the flame starter has all the backup claims to make and the victim being flamed has nothing but a pure zero? Okay.
So it's obvious that the flame starter is the clear winner.
If the victim doesn't accept that he's the loser, why bother to explain the him that he lost when he can't accept it in the first place? -
I believe in second chances, never in lost hope.Originally posted by Parka: Okay.
So it's obvious that the flame starter is the clear winner.
If the victim doesn't accept that he's the loser, why bother to explain the him that he lost when he can't accept it in the first place? -
Originally posted by ditzy:I believe in second chances, never in lost hope. Well, in NS there are many such examples.
BBB chao keng. AAA tells BBB to change. BBB doesn't change.
There's practically nothing to do except to let BBB rot. -
at least to let him know that there are pple out there who stand up for such ridiculous accusations or blatant flaming with no substantial proof but based solely on a personal discretion... this type of pple ought to be told flatly in the face that his behaviour is unwarranted and uncalled for; and if possible to collect enough evidence to ban such a character...not just those who just post lewd remarks nia.Originally posted by Parka: To me it looks like the same thing.
If the victim don't learn, don't waste time.
The whole idea is to let tat fellow know that the rest of the forumites here are not blind and brainless pple (like Croco), who will stand united against any individual who rulely cast insulting remarks at others, and even walking along the boundary of the touchy religious belief issues.
The person knows abt the resentment against him, but pride forbids him to come forth to discuss with the masses here; it is alright he sticks to his damn beliefs; but never go about slamming other beliefs which is not his is the crux of the matter.
mi hav been very forgiving and crapping around for a long time, but some pple just think Croco is a benign creature to step upon... wait tills the Crocodile bites back...wahhahhaha
aiyo, all these will never end when some pple just dun know simple basic courtesy to relate on a more amiacable mode by putting things into a discussion, and simple just lash out at others with bombastic phrases and walk into others conflict without knowing what is "xie" and what is not
haiz -
but we cannot just let the flame starter gets away with his tricks... in many cases recently, many stood up for their pals here in the forum against some topid accusations; all in force to show the flame starter that the victim is not along and a message to the flame starter that he better shut up his gap or face the wrath of the masses here... it is not that we wanna behave like tyrants, but in the face of such lawless creature, it warms to see that pals stand up against such acts, a message to the flame starter, beware of your words again.Originally posted by Parka: Okay.
So it's obvious that the flame starter is the clear winner.
If the victim doesn't accept that he's the loser, why bother to explain the him that he lost when he can't accept it in the first place? -
Originally posted by sgboy2004:at least to let him know that there are pple out there who stand up for such ridiculous accusations or blatant flaming with no substantial proof but based solely on a personal discretion... this type of pple ought to be told flatly in the face that his behaviour is unwarranted and uncalled for; and if possible to collect enough evidence to ban such a character...not just those who just post lewd remarks nia.
The whole idea is to let tat fellow know that the rest of the forumites here are not blind and brainless pple (like Croco), who will stand united against any individual who rulely cast insulting remarks at others, and even walking along the boundary of the touchy religious belief issues.
The person knows abt the resentment against him, but pride forbids him to come forth to discuss with the masses here; it is alright he sticks to his damn beliefs; but never go about slamming other beliefs which is not his is the crux of the matter.
mi hav been very forgiving and crapping around for a long time, but some pple just think Croco is a benign creature to step upon... wait tills the Crocodile bites back...wahhahhaha
aiyo, all these will never end when some pple just dun know simple basic courtesy to relate on a more amiacable mode by putting things into a discussion, and simple just lash out at others with bombastic phrases and walk into others conflict without knowing what is "xie" and what is not
haiz Yes of course. But when the person can't understand logic anymore, there is nothing much you can do. -
Sometimes it may be called running away from reality.
Sometimes it's not.
There are some people who are simply unable to put things down and keep brooding. -
it is not that the person cannot understand logic, it is that he chose, in the name of pride, to shun away from any of his wrongdoings... separate from what he believes...cos his wrongdoings is abt flaming and accusation.Originally posted by Parka: Yes of course. But when the person can't understand logic anymore, there is nothing much you can do.
He can go ahead and continue to believe in wat he thinks is right or wrong, but he has to admit his act of flaming pple is wrong; and so far in recent cases, it is a matter of hard-headed, face-pride syndrome in play...
We respect individual's belief; but not the denouncing of others belief...he should at least apologise to the victim.
Well, at least now we all know his style and way of doing things... more will shun him in the future, and tat in effect, part of your methodology of ignoring the flame starter
Cheers -
To practice what I preach, I'm not going to post in this thread anymore.
-
Then I will have nothing but pity for the person but my doors will always remain open for the day the light comes through.Originally posted by Parka: Yes of course. But when the person can't understand logic anymore, there is nothing much you can do. -
Originally posted by Parka: To practice what I preach, I'm not going to post in this thread anymore.
-
Ok, bye!Originally posted by Parka: To practice what I preach, I'm not going to post in this thread anymore. -
Originally posted by ditzy:
forum so big n so many ppl have seen whats going on already. but ppl have to choose to take sides.
Which is a better way of resolving a dispute within this entire sgforums, say...between 2 parties? slug it out in forum thread after thread, until one party calls for a truce and the topic is closed/deleted. organise an outing(eg. ktv), with its 2 parties turning up to settle the matter face to face and perhaps additional participants acting as alibis'.
Care to share your suggestions, ideas, and opinions? I would love to hear them. Thank you for taking time to read this.
Any similarities or resemblance(within this post) to real life examples is strictly coincidental and totally NON-intentional.
so what makes u think that with a small no of people in an outing, the situation will be better? -
hahaha... me learn from someone who is not even a mada one lor.... saying abt handcuff and stuff... but normally i dun even use laws at pple.... throw back to tracom liao....Originally posted by chunyong:ha, unlawful assembly ? wun lah...unless one fella brings a parang or something. common motive is to settle a misunderstanding or dispute not SMLJ settlement talk. there is no law to govern you cannot assemble in large numbers for legitimate purposes. you are free to sit and position yourself where you want in public places.
ah dee...you just become mada huh ? don't really take wat u learn in tracom out to the 'outside' world, don't work one lah....haha. -
I have no idea how that would help, but we're all keeping our fingers crossed.Originally posted by Dan Ryou Shou:forum so big n so many ppl have seen whats going on already. but ppl have to choose to take sides.
so what makes u think that with a small no of people in an outing, the situation will be better? -
The intuition of the moral sentiment is an insight of the perfection of the laws of the soul. These laws execute themselves. They are out of time, out of space, and not subject to circumstance. Thus; in the soul of man there is a justice whose retributions are instant and entire. He who does a good deed, is instantly ennobled. He who does a mean deed, is by the action itself contracted.... Pure "Evil" perhaps..."Karma" in return...with a tag of "Justice"...Originally posted by ditzy:Which is a better way of resolving a dispute within this entire sgforums, say...between 2 parties? slug it out in forum thread after thread, until one party calls for a truce and the topic is closed/deleted. organise an outing(eg. ktv), with its 2 parties turning up to settle the matter face to face and perhaps additional participants acting as alibis'.
Care to share your suggestions, ideas, and opinions? I would love to hear them. Thank you for taking time to read this.
Any similarities or resemblance(within this post) to real life examples is strictly coincidental and totally NON-intentional.
Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character.... Moral or Immoral as such Deeds Ones committed can be seen in the Facts...Reality of Life...
Truth always rests with the minority, and the minority is always stronger than the majority, because the minority is generally formed by those who really have an opinion, while the strength of a majority is illusory, formed by the gangs who have no opinion—and who, therefore, in the next instant (when it is evident that the minority is the stronger) assume its opinion ... while Truth again reverts to a new minority.... Truth is generally the best vindication against slander.... Falsehood is easy, truth so difficult.... Some minds remain open long enough for the truth not only to enter but to pass on through by way of a ready exit without pausing anywhere along the route....
Truth is mighty and will prevail. There is nothing the matter with this, except that it ain't so....
Sad but True...so is there a "Light" or forever a "Shadow" of body, mind & soul...
Blessed Be,
Oceanos -
u alll these Cao AH LIAns!!!!!!!
HAte YOU!!
ANG MO LIEW LIANs
-
wonder who ah ma is scolding???Originally posted by Ah Ma:u alll these Cao AH LIAns!!!!!!!
HAte YOU!!
ANG MO LIEW LIANs -
