and what news?
did the news make discriminatory remarks about Buddhists and Atheists?
so you cant prove it right?
based on what kum lan news channel you watching?
Originally posted by ƒlame:
Speech of freedom please. I can said what I want based on the news. Btw, Joachim Kang has already repent and the court has given him a second chance, has ming yi any chance ?
This is not the main point
Do not divert
Why did you attack Buddhist and Atheists when they did not offend you in the first place?
Originally posted by laurence82:knn, caught liao try to guai wan mo jiao with me
Originally posted by ƒlame:
Wtf ? even if i had done wrong, you no wrong is it ?
Like i said, other issues are not the main point
You are the first to try to raise this discriminatory issue wih me, and when i pointed out how wrong you are, tmd give me so many diversionary points
Dont make me keep count of how many smoke bombs you are throwing right now
Originally posted by laurence82:
Like i said, other issues are not the main pointYou are the first to try to raise this discriminatory issue wih me, and when i pointed out how wrong you are, tmd give me so many diversionary points
Dont make me keep count of how many smoke bombs you are throwing right now
Originally posted by ƒlame:
HAHAHA now i'm in the wrong, you no wrong. What are you doing insisting i am wrong instead of looking at yourself first.
Again, diverting issue
Why did you discriminate against Buddhists and Atheists when they did not offend you in the first place?
Originally posted by ƒlame:
HAHAHA now i'm in the wrong, you no wrong. What are you doing insisting i am wrong instead of looking at yourself first. Walan uh, I am not raising this discriminatory issue with you, I am talking to king.
u go look at ur post at 7.23pm
u raised it with me
it was worse enough you wrongly accused sgforums king by that time
Originally posted by laurence82:
u go look at ur post at 7.23pmu raised it with me
it was worse enough you wrongly accused sgforums king by that time
Originally posted by ƒlame:
HAHAHA now i'm in the wrong, you no wrong. What are you doing insisting i am wrong instead of looking at yourself first. Walan uh, I am not raising this discriminatory issue with you, I am talking to king.
u want ask me what? i fer sure win 1
Originally posted by ƒlame:
I raised it with you why ? Because your words of christians being money grubbers is very offending. I admit that I said "because they buddhist" but I did not add on any offensive materials.
those sentence are already offensive enough
u said its because they are buddhists
pls do not take everyone here as three year old kids
Originally posted by Sgforum King:u want ask me what? i fer sure win 1
he is already on the losing end
either he defend himself or he bite back, or like what he did earlier, throw many many smoke bombs
but he know not whom he crosses
Originally posted by laurence82:those sentence are already offensive enough
u said its because they are buddhists
pls do not take everyone here as three year old kids
Originally posted by ƒlame:
Oh, then your meaning that you said christians are money grubbers super offensive, all christians can sue you for calling them money grubbers.
do not divert posts
why did you said such things about Buddhists and Atheists when they did not offend u in the first place?
Originally posted by ƒlame:
Oh, then your meaning that you said christians are money grubbers super offensive, all christians can sue you for calling them money grubbers.
yeah, eh sgforums king, u can start suing him for saying atheists causes religious wars
small kid, sue sue sue
dont even know what the fark is litigation
all u do is to learn from tv
knn
Originally posted by ƒlame:
Oh, then your meaning that you said christians are money grubbers super offensive, all christians can sue you for calling them money grubbers.
except for Joachim Kang.
I once saw on television this pastor sell mineral water to believers who think that drinking it can heal their illness. After that this pastor went to jail for fraud.
Originally posted by laurence82:
do not divert postswhy did you said such things about Buddhists and Atheists when they did not offend u in the first place?
Originally posted by ƒlame:
Answer me man, stop diverting me to ignore what offensive words you have said that are more severe than my sentence of "cause they buddhist " . In 7.23pm, I state that it's because of atheist like you, yet I did not offend you and my words are directed towards Sgforum King.
can summarise? i lazy read
Originally posted by laurence82:
do not divert postswhy did you said such things about Buddhists and Atheists when they did not offend u in the first place?
Originally posted by laurence82:
yeah, eh sgforums king, u can start suing him for saying atheists causes religious warssmall kid, sue sue sue
dont even know what the fark is litigation
all u do is to learn from tv
knn
i think if the world is atheists there will be lesser problem. u read ur SS textbook on ireland u will know
Originally posted by Sgforum King:i think if the world is atheists there will be lesser problem. u read ur SS textbook on ireland u will know
Originally posted by ƒlame:
Answer me man, stop diverting me to ignore what offensive words you have said that are more severe than my sentence of "cause they buddhist " . In 7.23pm, I state that it's because of atheist like you, yet I did not offend you and my words are directed towards Sgforum King.
pls
at post 7.04pm., u said
After the Ren Ci incident, ppl knows that buddhists are the biggest money grubbers ard
at post 7.17pm, you said
Oh i get it, I finally get it. It's because of atheist like you that causes such unnecessary argument between each different religion.
you specifically use the word atheist, knn, so now whats your peeve with Buddhists and Atheists when they did not offend you in the first place?
Originally posted by ƒlame:
you knn here and tmd there, you think you very gangster is it ? kp hoh.
u are young punk, and thats how i talk to young punk
i talk to adults differently
Originally posted by ƒlame:Originally posted by Sgforum King:
i said atheist not religion. why u help me repeatOh i get it, I finally get it. It’s because of atheist like you that causes such unnecessary argument between each different religion.
so my post said that i said atheist is not a religion and that u are helping me to repeat what i said. and ur post states that atheist like me cause argument between different religions. mind explaining?