how much will u spend to prevent a loss of $100?
-
how much will u spend to prevent a loss of $100?
if u noe u r going to lose tat $100 n u have the power to prevent it
-
???
-
none..
coz it happens, it happens..
-
Originally posted by e ICE:
how much will u spend to prevent a loss of $100
don;t spend 100dollas. like that you will not loose 100dollas -
not spent but lost so will u prevent it n how much are u willin to spend to prevent the loss?
-
you should try approaching any insurance companies to see if they have a policy for this..
-
10%
-
Originally posted by QX179R:
you should try approaching any insurance companies to see if they have a policy for this..
dun think any insurance company want a sure lose biz -
why is this shifted to aunt agony?
which mod. is in agony?
can move back to chit chat please?
-
murphy tells me not to bother about it....
-
Originally posted by e ICE:
how much will u spend to prevent a loss of $100?
if u noe u r going to lose tat $100 n u have the power to prevent it
that depends lah.
The $100 you saved, can make you $1000 or not ?
-
TS, are you referring to the entry to casino? $100 per pax?
-
If you littered, you will be asked to pay $300 fine.
How much money will you spend to prevent the loss of $300 through bribe?
Some just place two $50 note, but it wouldn't work. That means a one-third ratio wouldn't help prevent lost of full sum. Therefore, I suggest using 50% as a bench mark. 
Try three pieces of $50, maybe you would succeed. If you never try, you'll never know. -
Originally posted by jojobeach:
that depends lah.
The $100 you saved, can make you $1000 or not ?
@jojo - wen u saved any amount from the $100, its making-----------------------------
@likeyou - i m not refering to casino entrance fee, $100 is just a ref. figure
-------------------------------
@darkness - tats bribin
-
Casino is evil havent go in lose 100 SGD.
-
easy
if you have to lose $100 to person A, just make sure that person A loses $200 back to you in other ways.
;)
Why prevent a loss when you can profit twice as much?
-
Originally posted by DRC:
easy
if you have to lose $100 to person A, just make sure that person A loses $200 back to you in other ways.
;)
Why prevent a loss when you can profit twice as much?
u wan to be tat person A? -
since you did not qualify what makes you lose that 100 though u have the power to prevent it, and u emphasize to spend, and not in any other ways....
with so much unknowns...u just have to spend as little as possible...and cap at a certain amount depending on whether its worth to spend further to recover that loss...
aiyo...that 100, to me, can forget it la...my time is more precious to make more money than to think how to recover it...
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
since you did not qualify what makes you lose that 100 though u have the power to prevent it, and u emphasize to spend, and not in any other ways....
with so much unknowns...u just have to spend as little as possible...and cap at a certain amount depending on whether its worth to spend further to recover that loss...
aiyo...that 100, to me, can forget it la...my time is more precious to make more money than to think how to recover it...
u hav a point
let say the figure is 0.5m in a year and the loss thru pilferage
how much wld u spend to prevent tat loss?
-
now thats better...
there seems to be a consistent loss of money over a year amounting to 1/2 mil ..and u "confirmed" its through pilferage..and the power to prevent it was not utilised perhaps due to overlooking it or gross negligence...
would u consider legal action to recover that loss? well, depends on the complexity of the case....and the legal fees and chances of winning subject to circumstantial evidence and concrete proofs in order to decide the next step forward...
u would still need to qualify further the source of the money, how it was stored, the manner which it was lost....
-
I think you are trying to ask the question: how much will you spend for a X% chance to prevent losing $100. If X = 50, you should spend $50 but different people have different answers.
But if I was a minister trying to get re-elected, I would spend $500 at every funeral and baby's 1 month party in town. That works out to 1 cent per $100. That's me, most ministers spend less.
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
now thats better...
there seems to be a consistent loss of money over a year amounting to 1/2 mil ..and u "confirmed" its through pilferage..and the power to prevent it was not utilised perhaps due to overlooking it or gross negligence...
would u consider legal action to recover that loss? well, depends on the complexity of the case....and the legal fees and chances of winning subject to circumstantial evidence and concrete proofs in order to decide the next step forward...
u would still need to qualify further the source of the money, how it was stored, the manner which it was lost....
u had it too complex. its just a matter of how much to spend to prevent tat loss
-
Originally posted by alize:
I think you are trying to ask the question: how much will you spend for a X% chance to prevent losing $100. If X = 50, you should spend $50 but different people have different answers.
But if I was a minister trying to get re-elected, I would spend $500 at every funeral and baby's 1 month party in town. That works out to 1 cent per $100. That's me, most ministers spend less.
yes, u got itif u r the minister, u have my vote
-
it depends on whether its worth pursuing, in a nutshell....too little loss does not justify my time....if its substantial, legal means where possible....but no illegal means or useless means that would only incur more losses...
-
Jiap my parent's Genting SP share and invest. Then when earn money just divide from there lor...